h1

Mission: Impossible – Quitting Nicotine (Day 4)

August 21, 2010

Okay, last night I didn’t sleep well at all. I don’t know if it was because I hadn’t been chewing leading up to going to bed or because I’d been chugging Mountain Dew all day long and continued to do so past midnight. My guess is the latter, considering my body was tired, but my mind just wouldn’t stop racing.

Today hasn’t been all that rough. I woke up around 11:30 and I’ve basically been lounging around and playing online poker since. I’m having a ridiculously bad day of poker. One of those days where you look at the board and only one or two hands can beat what you have and they have it every single time. I think I got stacked four times in less than an hour playing NL cash games today. Just a brutal session. I always seem to follow up a nice score with a terrible day. The Poker Gods just refuse to let me consistently build a bankroll. All in all, I haven’t been running well in cash games anyways. I should just stick to tournaments… I’m killing them right now, I just don’t have time for them today.

When you have a bad day of poker like I’m having, it’s natural to want to cave in and buy some chew, take a dip, and relieve the tension. Today, I’m preferring to take the Lord’s name in vain… repeatedly. My roommates are church-going fellows and are probably a J.F.C. away from giving me a holy knuckle sandwich. Knuckle sandwich? Who says that anymore? That reminds me, is it possible to bring back the word “dweeb?” I haven’t heard it in a long time and I know that if someone were to call me a “dweeb,” even today, it’d feel like being punched in the stomach. It’s more insulting than “douche,” which has become today’s most popular cliche put down. We’re all a bunch of “fags” and the only people insulted by that nowadays are the actual gay people that are loosely being associated with all the “douches” and “dweebs” tossing their sexuality around like it applies to everything. Homosexuality has become the Insult World’s “it tastes like chicken.”

Okay… I’m obviously going nuts right now. I need to get ready for work, which will be a good thing. My post-shift dip is a big one and the drive home is even bigger. If I make it back to you with my dipless streak still in tact, there might be hope for me yet.

Hours since last dip: 18

h1

Kick-Ass (2010)

August 20, 2010

“Show’s over, motherfuckers.”

I was really anticipating this one and the results were mixed. It had a fun feeling to it, but the main character really didn’t move me at all and almost all the other characters were pretty hollow as well. Kick-Ass never felt like a superhero of any sort to me… just a nerdy kid in a bad costume. Hit-Girl is what made this movie borderline awesome despite all its flaws. Not only is the character well written and an utter bad ass, but the young girl that plays her displays a ton of acting talent. The movie has some good action and is funny at times, but the story wasn’t executed spectacularly and the casting was questionable.

That was my initial review back when I first saw Kick-Ass in theaters and after watching it again on DVD last night, not a whole lot has changed. I’m still really underwhelmed by the character of Kick-Ass. The kid gets credit for having the balls to put himself in hopeless situations and it shouldn’t be surprised when he finds himself hospitalized after his first attempt at heroism, but at his core, he’s a scrawny geek and there’s not really a moment in the film where you think he might actually amount to something.

Hit-Girl remains the story here and I think, rather than a Kick-Ass sequel (which is already announced), a spin off starring this character would make more sense. She’s awesome and easily steals the show. Chloe Moretz, the 12 year old girl that plays Hit-Girl, seems to be a rising talent and someone to keep an eye on. She already has numerous roles lined up and is set to star in the American remake of the Swedish film Let The Right One In due out October 8th, 2010. Normally, I’d be suspect about an American remake of nearly any film, especially so soon after its release, but Moretz has me highly interested, especially since her role actually has Oscar potential, an assessment I can make having read the novel.

I was a little hard on Kick-Ass the first time I saw it. It’s not really a mediocre film, it simply suffers because its main character isn’t all that great. I liked it upon a second viewing and I’d bump its grade up a bit. It’s worth watching for Hit-Girl alone, but is a pretty decent comic book/superhero film on its own regard. I’d recommend it.

Grade: B-
Viewings: 2
Replay Value: On the cusp of being a DVD worth owning. The edition I rented had no special features, but there’s a 3-disc edition that’s probably worth investing in. I’d pop it in once in a while.
Oscar Potential? I can’t really imagine this movie getting any attention. Maaaaaaaaaybe for Best Costumes.
Sequel Potential? Kick-Ass 2: Balls To The Wall is already announced. I’d be interested, not only for more Hit-Girl, but to see if they can actually do something worthwhile with the main character.
Nudity? Well, there’s some National Geographic type nudity when Kick-Ass is surfing the net for jerk off material, but that’s it. It wouldn’t have hurt to have this girl naked:

h1

Revisiting 1990: Goodfellas

August 20, 2010

Considered For: Top 5

“What are you, a fuckin’ sick maniac?”

Interesting. I’ve long thought of Goodfellas as the top film of 1990, but after watching it last night, I realize that I may have never even seen it. I was positive that I had, but nothing about this movie seemed familiar and I know damn well I haven’t seen Lorraine Bracco in a movie since I’ve started watching The Sopranos. I really felt that I’ve seen this movie before, but last night I felt like I was watching it for the first time.

Goodfellas is an epic story, based on a true story, about the Italian mob in New York City from the 1950s through the 1970s. Ray Liotta plays Henry Hill, our “hero,” a kid that grows up wanting nothing more than to be a gangster. He starts off as a delivery boy for respected mob figures Paul Cicero (Paul Sorvino) and Jimmy Conway (Robert De Niro) and works his way up the ranks with friend Tommy DeVito (later played by Joe Pesci) and they both wind up integral parts of the organization by their early 20s (although Pesci was nearly 50 when this movie filmed… LOL). Henry eventually meets Karen (Bracco), they marry, and together they become enraptured and victimized by the ways of the organized crime business and the financial freedom and social dominance it offers.

I hate to say it, but I think Goodfellas might be a tad overrated. For one, I didn’t like it as much as Miller’s Crossing, another 1990 film focused on organized crime. I’ll take Gabriel Byrne’s Tom Reagan over Liotta’s Henry Hill any day, in terms of both character and acting. For two, a #17 of all-time ranking on IMDB’s greatest movies ever list seems overboard. With that said, Goodfellas is still a very good movie and probably deserved more acclaim than 1990’s most highly lauded film Dances With Wolves, a movie noticeably absent from IMDB’s same list.

Goodfellas does feature a stellar cast. I knew before watching that Lorraine Bracco was Oscar-nominated, but watching the film, I kept thinking of what a great job Joe Pesci was doing as the outlandishly violent and explosive Tommy DeVito. When I researched the Oscars after the movie, I was pleased to find out that not only was Pesci nominated, but he took home the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor. Very deserved. Bracco was also outstanding as Henry’s wife, Karen, dealing with the loose morals of a wiseguy husband, a man that thinks it’s okay to have multiple girlfriends in addition to a wife. She does a great job walking the line between jealous, vengeful wife and drug-addled woman addicted to the life of crime, quick money and supposedly easy living. I find it astonish that in the 9 years between Goodfellas and her role as Dr. Melfi on The Sopranos, the biggest movie she was in was Hackers. Robert De Niro offers a good performance, but it wasn’t much of a stretch for him and I wouldn’t rank it amongst the top five of his career or even his best of the year (check out Awakenings). I’m not sure Ray Liotta was the best choice for Henry Hill. Apparently, Liotta turned down the role of Harvey Dent in Tim Burton’s Batman in order to star in Goodfellas, a good move considering no one remembers Harvey Dent in the original Batman and Goodfellas is by far the best film Liotta’s ever worked in. Liotta does a decent enough job, but some of his scenes, mostly when he is laughing hysterically, made me cringe a little bit. Liotta has never really gone on to do anything worthwhile for his career and I wonder if Goodfellas could have been even better with a more capable actor in the lead role.

It would be a fair argument to say that Martin Scorsese should have won his first Best Director Oscar in 1991 for Goodfellas. While Dances With Wolves might have been an easier film for the Academy to swallow, I can’t imagine someone saying with a straight face that it’s a better film, particularly in the directing department. There’s a great scene in Goodfellas where the camera follows Henry and Karen through the back entrance of a restaurant, through the kitchen, and into the dining room where a table is immediately set for them, not once breaking for a separate take. Simply put, Goodfellas was better than Dances With Wolves and Scorsese, long overlooked by the Academy, was robbed.

I don’t want you to come away from this review with the impression that I didn’t like Goodfellas that much. I loved it. Yes, maybe Ray Liotta wasn’t the best choice for Henry Hill; yes, I liked Miller’s Crossing more; but Goodfellas was still a GREAT film, just maybe not as great as some people have made it out to be. If you haven’t ever seen Goodfellas, I’d bump it to the top of your Must Rent list and if it’s been a while since you’ve seen it, it’s worth revisiting.

Grade: A
Viewings: maybe 2?
Replay Value: A must for the DVD collection.
Oscars: A Best Supporting Actor win for Pesci. Nominations for Bracco, Scorsese, Best Picture, Film Editing, and Adapted Screenplay.
Sequel Potential: None. Based on a true story.
Nudity? Amazingly, no. Lots of sexual references, but no nudity that I can remember.

h1

Entourage Season Six

August 20, 2010

I’ve been hearing some talk that Entourage has jumped the shark and I don’t really get it. It was never a great show to begin with. Entourage is the equivalent of the mindless, summer blockbuster, guilty pleasure at your local cinema. The story has never been riveting, the acting has never been great (outside of Jeremy Piven’s Ari Gold), and no one is ever going to ever laud Entourage for its intricate writing. The allure of Entourage is similar to why people like reality T.V. shows. The only difference really is the characters in this show are mostly fictional. I say “mostly” because Entourage is loosely based on actor Mark Wahlberg’s own experiences as a movie star. With that said, as long as Entourage delivers ridiculously hot (and often naked) women, a healthy dose of humor, and a look at what it might be like to be famous, I don’t see how fans can be disappointed.

While maybe not as strong as previous seasons, season six delivers more of the same. It does attempt to get a little heavier than normal, however. Vince struggles briefly with loneliness, E continues his bitch ass ways with women and can’t seem to shake ex-girlfriend Sloan from his memory, Drama runs into trouble after a successful run on his show Five Towns, Turtle experiences problems with Jamie Lynn-Sigler for the first time, and Ari deals with an affair within his agency that could cause major problems. Whatever.

What’s missing, for me, from this season is Vincent Chase as a movie star. He apparently starred in a big hit based on the book The Great Gatsby directed by Martin Scorsese and has resurrected his career after a couple of flops… but we really don’t get to see anything about Gatsby. I don’t even think we ever saw Vince act a single scene. I still remember how cool I thought it was when the show created an entire sequence for Aquaman. Season six focuses on Vince’s actual film career the least of any season to date. We have Gatsby in the past and his next project as a race car driver in the future… in between, we have season six, which seems to focus on all the secondary characters. Granted, these characters are all vastly more interesting than Vince, but still, Vince as a movie star is still the force that drives the show and I want to see more of it.

Thankfully, the show is not a total loss like some might suggest it has become. While Vince may be between movies, that doesn’t stop plenty of hot chicks happily dropping their panties for him and we still get envy his ability to have any woman he wants. Drama and Lloyd are still hilarious and I think this was still a strong season for the Ari Gold character. Even if someone hated this season, they had to enjoy Ari’s scene in the finale with the paintball gun. C’mon now! Season six also has solid cameos from Tom Brady, Mark Wahlberg, and Matt Damon.

I’ve never cared for E’s character and he continues to be more of the same. His continued fascination with Sloan, while understandable, is obnoxious, even more so because he’s dating a perfectly good looking girl anyways. Just when you think E can’t sink to new lows, the season closes with him at his most ridiculous. I won’t spoil the surprise, but it’s brutal and doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. The biggest disappointment in season six is Turtle’s transformation into a simp. His entire arc in season six focuses on his relationship with actress Jamie Lynn-Sigler of Sopranos fame. No thanks, we already have one E and we didn’t like it when you pulled this stunt with Vince and Mandy Moore.

Entourage might not be as good as it once was… but it’s not like we’re talking about Weeds here. This show is still plenty watchable and has lots of fun moments. So before you start saying things like Entourage has jumped the shark, remember, it wasn’t all that great to begin with.

Grade: C+
Viewings: 1.5
Replay Value: Decent amount, but I’m personally glad I never invested in the series on DVD.
Emmy Awards: After a string of 3 straight Emmy wins, Piven hasn’t been nominated the past two years and Entourage could only muster one nomination in 2010: for sound mixing. Ouch.
Nudity? Tons! Yay!

h1

Mission:Impossible – Quitting Nicotine – Day 3

August 20, 2010

10:00 A.M.

Today is the day that I plan to quit chewing. I woke up this morning with parts of two cans left, but certainly not enough to get me through the day. I have the day off, which is odd, because I work every single Friday, so I don’t have the luxury of serving tables for 6-7 hours to get me off to a nice, fresh start. That also means I won’t have the immense craving to take a dip as soon as I’m finished with my shift.

Some people might think that it’s odd for me to decide to quit tobacco when I have a likely second DUI conviction hanging over my head with potentially life-ruining consequences. With such pressure on my shoulders, quitting my two biggest vices within a month of each other might seem a colossal challenge, but I’m up for it. It simply needs to be done.

12:30 P.M.

Okay, I’m awake now for real. I just took the last dip of one my cans and it’s time to prepare myself for the day. It’s going to be rough since I basically have nothing to do all day. I went to the gas station to buy some groceries, but also to make sure I got some sunflower seeds and gum… it’s important to keep my mouth working if I’m going to get through this.

4:45 P.M.

Just put my last dip in.

6:00 P.M.

Damn, I’m hungry, but I can’t spit this dip out prematurely. I must savor it to its last dying bits of flavor… until the spit is no longer tobacco-colored. I am kind of starving though. My last real meal (and by that I mean Taco Bell) was Wednesday night. Yesterday I ate some fries, some soup, and half a peach cobbler. That’s it. Today, I’ve had some chips. I’m kind of dying here. I think I’ll get a pizza… but probably not for two more hours. LOL.

8:00 P.M.

Okay, I’ve had this last dip in for 3+ hours and my hunger is starting to overwhelm me. I just ordered a pizza, which is going to take about a half hour to get here. The final stretch of use has begun.

8:49 P.M.

Pizza has arrived and I just spit out my last dip. Abstaining begins…

8:53 P.M.

Wow, this pizza is lukewarm as fuck. Shit was probably ready 30 minutes ago. Shouldn’t have to pay $20 for a pizza and need to hit up the microwave.

9:30 P.M.

Just finished eating that lackluster pizza and as I was nearing completion, I could feel that craving coming over me. For a couple of minutes, I seriously considered saying “Fuck it,” but then I remembered the three people following my blog would be disappointed in me. The craving has died a little bit, but it was always extremely strong as soon as I was finished with a meal. Thankfully, I have a full bag of chips, sunflower seeds, and a pack of gum to tide me through the night. I have a feeling I’ve already passed the toughest craving I’m going to get tonight.

1:19 A.M.

Or maybe not. I’ve just spent the last 5+ hours playing in an online poker tournament. I finished 7th out of 1761 people for a healthy prize. Not what I was shooting for, and at the moment I’m kind of disappointed, but it was a great score for my bankroll. While I was playing, I kept busy by chewing sunflower seeds, eating pizza, and chewing gum, but as soon as the tournament was over, I once again considered pushing back my start date. I can start my quest on Monday, right? All I have to do is drive down to the gas station and I can put myself out of this misery. Am I even going to be able to sleep tonight? I think I’m going to make it through tonight because my favored chew is sold at very few places and the one nearby is closed now, so I’d be getting a second rate product if I broke down right now. Not really worth it.

I’ve been typing up my thoughts as they’ve come to me all day and now that I’m about to go to bed, or at least lay down, I’m finally going to publish it. I might have more to add later tonight if I have problems getting to sleep, but if not, I’ll see you tomorrow, my first full day of tobacco abstinence.

h1

Revisiting 1990: Dances With Wolves

August 18, 2010

Considered For: Top 5

“Turned Injun, didn’t yeh?”

I can’t say I was looking forward to watching Dances With Wolves as its run time was intimidating (3 hours, 45 minutes) and the story didn’t really scream of excitement. Usually when I’m not amped up for a sweeping epic, I’ll start the movie a couple of times, watch about ten minutes, before giving up and sending it back to Netflix. It did take me roughly 48 hours to make it through Dances With Wolves, but I found myself enjoying it a lot more than I was expecting.

Based on a novel, the story thrusts us into an undisclosed time in history and introduces us to Lt. John Dunbar (Kevin Costner) suffering from a wound on his leg that most likely will cost him the limb. Next thing you know, Dunbar forces his foot into a boot and starts riding a horse in the middle of an open war zone, basically on a suicide mission. The opposition apparently has the worst shot in the world as Dunbar survives unharmed, rallies his troops, and is eventually seen as a hero. He’s rewarded for his efforts by receiving a post in an isolated fort on the frontier to be manned by himself.

At this fort, Dunbar becomes lonely and finds that his only company is his horse Sysco and a wolf he names Two Socks that frequents the area. Before long, a few Indians show up and after realizing that the white man is not a threat, Dunbar finds himself assimilating in their culture. The majority of the film focuses on Dunbar’s experience with the Sioux tribe, conveniently assisted by a white woman (Mary McDonnell) the tribe had taken in as a child, but ultimately, conflict arises, and Dunbar finds himself at odds with the American Army.

I’m no fan of Kevin Costner as an actor and his perfomance in Dances With Wolves, although Oscar-nominated, is nothing spectacular either. Dunbar is a good character, but Costner doesn’t bring anything extra to the table and I can imagine several more talented actors making this an iconic character. I’m not really sure what to make of Mary McDonnell’s performance either. She has gone on to star in one of my favorite science fiction shows (Battlestar Galactica) and grew into a solid actress. Her work here was Oscar-nominated as well, but she spent the majority of the movie with a seemingly blank look on her face. Perhaps it was because her character, Stands With A Fist, was in mourning for most of the movie, but the effect left me slightly unimpressed. The best acting in this movie is clearly done by the Native Americans and any movie that can take actors I’m not familiar with and turn them into memorable characters gets kudos from me.

spoilers ahead

I wasn’t really moved by Dances With Wolves, like I think I was supposed to be, but I enjoyed the movie quite a bit. It’s kind of weird that an animal (Two Socks) without a speaking role was my favorite character and the saddest parts in the film were when both Sysco and Two Socks got the ax. Sysco’s death made sense in the scheme of the scene, but killing off Two Socks was purely pointless. I refuse to believe a wild animal would stand still while humans are repeatedly shooting at it. The wolf can barely muster up the courage to take a piece of meat out of John Dunbar’s hand, but was willing to stand its ground and be shot to death? Really? The end of the film confused me as well. It concludes with Dunbar leaving the winter camp of the Sioux Indians with his new wife, Stands With A Fist, because he fears the whites are going to come looking for him. Well, if they are going to come looking for you, they’re no less likely to stop by the winter camp simply because you left. Does he think the American Army is going to show up and be like “Hey, is John Dunbar in? No? Okay, thanks… sorry to bother you.” No, there will be bloodshed regardless, so dude might as well stay and take part in the fight. It was a very weak way to complete an otherwise very enjoyable movie.

I wouldn’t rank this movie amongst my all-time greats, and I’m not going to say you have to see it if you’ve somehow missed it these past twenty years, but it’s worth watching and wasn’t nearly the chore I was expecting it to be. It’s a good story, with mediocre acting, and a solid directorial effort from Costner. Better than I was expecting, but definitely not worth it’s Best Picture Oscar.

Grade: B-
Viewings: 1
Replay Value: Most films with running times of 3+ hours are tough to watch repeatedly.
Oscars: Won 7 Oscars, including Best Picture, Best Director (Costner), and Best Adapted Screenplay. Nominated for five others, including acting nominations for Costner, McDonnell, and Graham Greene.
Nudity: Mary McDonnell almost gets naked, but unfortunately nudity is limited to Kevin Costner’s ass… several times.

h1

Mission: Impossible – Quitting Nicotine – Day 1

August 17, 2010

The Premise: Nicotine addiction is a bitch and quitting usage is extremely hard. I’ve decided to blog about my attempt to quit chewing tobacco.

The Inspiration: I’m currently reading David Sedaris’ When You Are Engulfed In Flames and skipped ahead when I discovered he wrote extensively about his attempt to quit smoking cigarettes for good. Sedaris is a great–possibly my favorite–writer, so I knew an entire section devoted to the cessation of his favorite vice would be a great read. Needless to say, “The Smoking Section” has motivated me to mirror his efforts and blog about my own attempt to rid my life of nicotine use. People often say that in order to quit a habit, you need to replace it with a new one, so the goal here is to replace chewing with regular writing about quitting. I’m hoping I can become as obsessed with blogging about it as I am about actually using it. Sedaris decided to move to Japan for several months in order to quit smoking. I don’t have the financial–or legal–freedom to make such a move, so I’m planning on using the old-fashioned cold turkey method.

My History & Current Usage: My parents were chain-smokers when I was growing up and I adapted a hatred of cigarettes that has never died to this day. I’m 28 years old and I’ve never smoked a full cigarette in my life. In fact, my entire smoking history can be summed up in a single drag, taken after the first time I ever drank hard liquor. We’re talking about a 110 pound 9th grader that just took nine shots of vodka in less than thirty minutes. I was belligerently drunk, barely even conscious, and as far as I’m concerned, I’ve simply never smoked a cigarette.

Chewing tobacco has been a different story. I had no preconceived bias against chew, no built-in hatred, and the second-hand affects of chewing didn’t seem nearly as obnoxious or intrusive as someone smoking near you. I grew up playing baseball and sometime in my mid-teens I chewed tobacco for the first time with some of my teammates. I don’t remember loving or hating it, and even though I would dabble with it at times over the years, it never became a habit. Not until I was 24 and moved back home to Bremerton. I just got a job at a restaurant and my co-workers had a regular poker game that I started to frequent. A couple of the guys chewed and I would borrow until, eventually, I was providing for myself and a habit was born.

For the past four years, I have been chewing tobacco regularly. My usage can only be described as disgusting. I can think of very few situations where I do not have a dip in my mouth: when I’m sleeping, when I’m eating, when I’m working, and when I’m with or about to meet a woman I think I might be kissing relatively soon. THAT’S IT. I chew when I take a shower. I chew when I’m shaving, which can be difficult depending on the size of the wad in my mouth. I’m chewing RIGHT NOW. When I’m writing, laying in bed, on the computer, playing poker, driving, playing softball, watching TV. ALL THE TIME. Fuck brushing my teeth, it’s the first thing I do in the morning and the last thing I do before bed. I chew when I’m sick, even if it seems to be making me worse. I’ve skipped meals in favor of keeping a dip in my mouth. In fact, I almost never eat breakfast because I don’t give myself enough time in the morning to eat AND chew, and you know what’s getting crossed off the list if I have to choose between the two.

I’ve never developed the ability to swallow the spit created by chewing tobacco. I don’t know if that’s a good or bad thing. While it’s immensely gross to swallow the vile liquid leftover from dipping, swallowing also makes the habit easier to hide and less visible to those around you. Because I’m a spitter, I have to carry some type of cup or bottle with me everywhere I go. If someone were to walk into my room at any given time without warning, they are liable to find a number of 20 ounce bottles filled with viscous, brown spit and drained wads of chew. As the user this doesn’t bother me much, but I can only imagine the affect it has on the uninitiated. I can’t even count how many times I’ve accidentally knocked over such a bottle and watched in horror as it spilled all over my carpet. I’ve also had the displeasure of spitting into a certain bottle and drinking soda or beer from a similar one only to get them mixed up and take a sip of freshly expectorated, tobacco-tainted saliva. I don’t recommend that beverage to anyone. I also keep a spitter in my car at all times, and unlike my house/room where visitors are usually announced, I don’t always know ahead of time when someone might get in my car. It’s very unsightly.

Why I Need To Quit: There are lots of obvious health reasons to quit, but I really feel that few people stop for those exact reasons. Most younger smokers and chewers don’t care too much about the health complications: “Hey, I’m fine today. I can always quit later.” Older users starting to experience the consequences of their years of substance abuse often decide that’s it’s too late anyways: “Fuck it.” We all know what could happen if we smoke cigarettes or chew tobacco. We simply don’t care. It’s not an immediate concern… and though important, it’s not why I want to quit either.

I never understood why my parents would waste such substantial amounts of money on a habit they should have been able to shut off at any moment. By the time I graduated high school and school started to cost money, I’d often say they could have put me through college with all the money they spent on cigarettes over the years. It seemed like a fair statement and after racking up $30,000 in student loans that are now my responsibility to pay back, it was easy to feel resentful towards them. Even as an alcoholic and someone that has struggled deeply with my own demons, I couldn’t relate. My problems with alcohol have never been of the chemically dependent variety. I’ve never gone through withdrawals and even at the height of my problem, I might go a week without realizing it had been that long since I last drank. I get cravings for alcohol at times during a dry period, but I’ve never felt an overpowering urge to drink. Even when I relapsed after nearly two years of sobriety, it was because I wanted to, not because I felt compelled to.

It wasn’t until I first thought about quitting chewing that I understood that nicotine is an entirely different beast. Since it became habit-forming, the longest I have gone without dipping was for two months, the result of a period in my life when I was ridiculously focused on bettering myself. I had just gone through a breakup and I wanted to focus my energy on anything else and quitting chewing happened to fit the bill. Ultimately, I thought a new and improved me would help me get back with my ex and, after a brief period of success, when that failed to happen I went right back to chewing regularly.

In my experience, the hardest part about quitting nicotine is the first drive home after you’ve decided to quit. I’ve decided I’m done a number of times only to find myself stopping at the gas station before I get home. If you can make it home without stopping and get through the first night, you actually have a decent shot of sticking to the plan. The next day is still really tough, but if you make it through that, you have a real good shot. Most addicts associate their habits with various behaviors… For instance, a smoker might wake up and have a cigarette and coffee first thing every morning. If they eliminate the cigarette and continue the same behavior, the craving will almost certainly be overwhelming. This is a big problem for me because I associate chewing with virtually everything that I do. It’s hard for me to find the appropriate moment to quit. Maybe I want to quit during my work week since I have to go numerous hours during the day without chewing anyways. Well, the first thing I do as soon as all my tables leave is pop a dip in, so maybe I’ll wait until my days off to quit. Okay, I play softball on my days off and there is no way I’m not going to chew when I’m playing ball, so I guess I’ll wait for my work week. It’s a vicious cycle.

Even after I decided to create this blog idea, I went out and bought a can of chew. If I’m going to stop there’s no way my last can is going to be a brand I don’t really prefer. I had to get my favorite kind and go out with a blast, inevitably prolonging the process. It seems trivial, but to a regular dipper, there is a very noticeable difference between brands and I feel like I’d be doing myself a disservice if my last can was Copenhagen Straight Long Cut. I need Cope Straight Long Cut. Same company, nearly the same name, very different taste!

I really do plan to quit though (I promise!) and I’m hoping blogging about it will benefit my trial. Ultimately, I’m quitting because it’s an unnecessary expense, it’s disgusting and unattractive, and it obstructs my ability to carry out a normal day. I probably chew between 4-5 cans a week and at $6 a can that comes out to $100-$120 a month and $1200-$1450 a year. Those are some obscene figures for someone who is constantly living check-to-check. It’s also very undesirable to a woman, and even though I think I hide it well, it would be great not to have to worry about it at all. So my quest begins… and even though it will be a few days before I’m completely out of product, I’m looking forward to sharing my adventure with you.

h1

HBO’s Hung: Season 1

August 10, 2010

HBO’s Hung features Thomas Jane playing a high school basketball coach named Ray Drecker whose life is slowly unraveling. In the pilot episode we discover that he is divorced from his wife of twenty years, a woman that is now married to a much more financially stable dermatologist. In addition to this bit of information, we see a flashback to Ray’s house getting caught on fire and nearly burning to a crisp. Ray’s kids had preferred to live with him rather than their uptight mother, but after the fire, Ray finds himself all alone, living in a tent on his property.

It’s during these grim circumstances that Ray seeks some help and decides to attend a money-making seminar. At this point we’re introduced to Tanya (Jane Adams), a woman that Ray recognizes as someone that used to come into his class to read and teach poetry to his students. The seminar doesn’t really work for Ray, but one thing stood out to him: “everybody has one special tool that can help him succeed.” Ray can’t admit his revelation to the workshop, but he decides that he knows what his tool is: his cock. Apparently, the man is blessed and the rest of the season follows his shenanigans as he progresses into a male prostitute or, in the case of his business, a happiness consultant. Tanya jumps on the bandwagon as his pimp and together they dive head first into an industry they both really know nothing about.

The first season of this series isn’t particularly good. The characters are mostly uninteresting. It seems as though Ray is pining after his ex-wife (Anne Heche), but it’s hard to see what he finds desirable other than familiarity and family unity. She’s shallow and not particularly attractive. Dude can do better and does so… many times. I’m on the fence about Tanya… at times I like the character and other times I can’t stand her. Ray is given a decision later in the season to step up his prostitute game with a more resourceful potential pimp and it’s hard to see the dilemma: he needs money and the opportunity presented should be lucrative. On top of that, prior to their business arrangement, Tanya and Ray don’t have any kind of history aside from a couple of one night stands together. Any reasonable man would be like “look, you’re good people, but I need to rebuild my house and get my family back and this is simply something I can’t pass up. Sorry.” But this is a T.V. show and tension must occur, no matter how implausible. The one moment this show had to create an awesome moment, the writers decided they weren’t ready to tackle that particular corner just yet and pussied out.

The acting here is mediocre as well. Something about Thomas Jane screams ordinary. I’ve never seen him in anything that impressed me and many times through Hung’s first season, I found myself wondering if this guy was even acting at all (and not in the good way). The supporting cast is pretty lifeless too, with possibly the exception of Jane Adams as Tanya. In a series where it seems like everyone else is kind of going through the motions, she at least looks like she’s putting some effort into her performance. The acting highlight of the season goes to Natalie Zea who drops in for a four episode arc as Jemma, a mentally twisted client that Ray finds himself falling for. It’s never clear what Jemma’s true intentions are and that’s a testament to what Zea brings to the character. It was sad to see her go.

Hung isn’t a total failure however. The premise of an ordinary man diving into the world of prostitution creates several interesting situations and hot scenes. Ray soon discovers that there is nothing glamorous about selling yourself for sex as you can’t always pick your clients. In this business money talks, so it’s fun to see his reaction when he knocks on the door of a big-boned, 50+ eternal loner. Fortunately, the first season has Ray tangling with Tanya’s “friend” Lenore and the wife of his obnoxious neighbor, both ridiculously hot and fully naked. It’s primarily this reason why I’d continue to watch Hung, as plenty of good looking women happily shed their clothing. I’m also looking forward to seeing what happens when Ray’s family discovers what he’s now doing for a living. Not a particularly good show, but I can’t see too many straight men hating it too much.

Grade: C
Viewings: 1
Replay Value: Probably worth investing in a Mr Skin account instead of this DVD series.
Awards: Doubtful
Nudity?: Plenty! The saving grace of the series so far!

h1

Showtime’s United States Of Tara: Season 1

August 10, 2010

All I knew about United States Of Tara before I started watching it was that I liked Toni Collette as an actress and that a buddy of mine, with fantastic taste in film and T.V., recommended it to me. I’m not exactly sure what I was expecting, but if it wound up being a drama about the first woman President of The United States I wouldn’t have been surprised.

Five minutes into the pilot episode and I already knew what the title of the show was referencing. After a personal confessional with her digital camcorder about discovering her 15 year old daughter’s morning after pills, the next time we see Tara (Collette), she’s rummaging through her daughter’s closet, wearing a teenager’s clothes, with her jeans so low you can see plenty of her g-string. When her daughter discovers her, she says: “I’ve been searching in your closet for a half hour and I can’t get to fucking Narnia.” It doesn’t take a genius to figure out we’re dealing with multiple personalities here. It’s not long before this teenage version of Tara is identified as “T,” a flirtatious and foul personality that’s more a depiction of a father’s worst nightmare than an actual teenage girl. Either way, she immediately caught my attention and she’s the most entertaining of all of Tara’s “alters,” or any character on the series really. Whenever Tara transitions, it’s always “T” that I hope is getting the air time.

Aside from “T,” we’re introduced to Tara’s two other alters, “Buck” and “Alice.” “Buck” is a motorcycle-riding, beer-swigging, and cigarette-smoking MAN. “He” looks like he’d fit right in at a biker’s bar and I’m surprised I haven’t seen him spitting tobacco juice into a can yet. “Alice” is the series’ version of a 40’s or 50’s housewife… someone who looks like they’d use the words “proper” and “fluff” in their regular vernacular. It’s hard to say which personality has Collette at her acting best. Even though I find “Alice” the most annoying of all the alters, she’s probably also the most challenging to portray. The character is an absurd and exaggerated caricature, as are all the alters, but I think that’s the point. I’m no expert on Multiple Personality Disorder (or Dissociative Identity Disorder as it’s now called), but it seems that Tara’s split personalities are based on her own idea of a specific stereotype. Regardless, the range in personalities only showcases Collette’s talent as an actress and her Emmy win last year makes a lot more sense to me now. She especially shines in the season finale, when she transitions from personality to personality in the same camera shot. It’s a tour-de-force performance.

Dealing with all this is Tara’s immediately family: her husband Max (John Corbett), homosexual son Marshall (Keir Gilchrist), promiscuous daughter Kate (Brie Larson) and her sister Charmaine (Rosemarie Dewitt). A couple things are clear within the first couple of episodes. One, is that Tara’s husband and kids are in complete understanding of her condition, and two, that her sister doesn’t buy it one bit. I spent the first season trying to understand why that could be and all I could come up with is that Max and the kids have known Tara to have DID ever since they’ve known her, while Charmaine grew up with a normal human being who transitioned into the disease later in life, apparently from a traumatic experience at boarding school. This experience is a bit vague in itself… my natural assumption is that boarding school is a place for young girls, but my impression from the show is that it happened in Tara’s late teens.

Tara’s family is a moderately interesting group. While they are mostly understanding of her condition, often referring to her alters by name without so much as blinking at the switch, at other times it seems like they’ve reached their limits; all of them have a breaking point during the first season. Max hasn’t been all that interesting so far and the character isn’t a big deviation from what Corbett has done in the past (think Aidan Shaw on Sex & The City and the husband in My Big Fat Greek Wedding). The antics of Tara’s kids are much more entertaining. If I had a gay son, Marshall is exactly the kind of kid I’d want: smart, funny, sophisticated and nothing close to flamboyant. He seems like someone that could have the future of a David Sedaris, my favorite author. Kate is more of a father’s worst nightmare; she seems an offer short of having sex on camera for money (I’m looking at you Laurence Fishburne). Kate’s taste in men is borderline despicable and after a promising showing in the first couple episodes, her character becomes less and less likable as the season progresses.

Towards the end of the first season, a new personality emerges. It’s an interesting plot twist and again makes me wonder how accurate the show’s depiction of the disorder really is. Do people that actually have DID suddenly develop new personalities after years, maybe decades, of having the same rotation of alters? I don’t know, but either way, it makes for good television and only broadens the range that Toni Collette can display.

The United States Of Tara is a fun, good show. I’m not exactly blown away by anything here aside from Collette’s performance, but I’m interested enough to keep watching. Looking forward to checking out the second season and the possibility of more ridiculous personalities.

Grade: B
Viewings: 1
Replay Value: Worth watching again, but I wouldn’t own it.
Awards: Collette won the 2010 Golden Globe and 2009 Emmy for Best Actress In A Comedy and is nominated for the 2010 Emmy. Aside from nominations for the title sequence, this show has been passed up in the awards department, which goes to show that Collette’s performance is much better than the show actually is.
Nudity?: I can’t remember… but I’d be surprised if “T” doesn’t do something ridiculous at some point.

h1

Revisiting 1990: Miller’s Crossing

August 9, 2010

Considered For: Top 5

“What’s the rumpus?”

This is the first movie I watched on my quest to figure out the best movies of the past twenty years. I knew I’d seen it before, but for some reason I couldn’t remember anything about Miller’s Crossing. Even reading the synopsis didn’t ring much of a bell. I wonder how long it’s been since I’ve seen it… certainly since watching films has become important to me, which makes it weird that I was drawing a total blank. Not long into the movie though, things started clicking, and I remembered liking Miller’s Crossing very much. I left it off my initial top five list for 1990, but after getting a grilling on a hip-hop forum I post on for omitting it, I knew it was time to revisit this early Coen Brothers production.

Joel and Ethan Coen have been some really consistent filmmakers over the years. No Country For Old Men, The Big Lebowski, and Fargo all rank amongst my favorite films of their respective years, and now, Miller’s Crossing can be added to that list. I have no doubt that when my journey through 1990 is finished, this movie will be in my top five and, possibly, my top flick of the year. In Miller’s Crossing, the Coens tell a mob story that finds Tom Reagan (Gabriel Byrne) playing a loyal advisor to crime boss Leo (Albert Finney). Tom finds himself in hot water when it’s discovered that he’s banging the boss’ lady (Marcia Gay Harden), but Tom is never one to panic when he finds himself in hot water and always seems to have a plan in motion.

While I won’t say Miller’s Crossing is a spectacular mob film like, say, The Godfather, it’s definitely a solid story. Byrne plays Tom with a calm, cool, and collected suave… so much so, that you never doubt that he’s in control of all his problems. John Turturro shows up as Harden’s brother, and the cause of the initial conflict in the film…. the shmatte. He’s at his pathetic best when he’s taken out to Miller’s Crossing for his reckoning. Albert Finney, Marcia Gay Harden, and Jon Polito all give solid performances as well.

It’s probably been a while since most people have seen this movie and for those of you that haven’t, I’d highly recommend it. An early Coen Brothers classic!

Grade: A
Viewings: 2
Replay Value: Worth owning
Oscars: Snubbed
Nudity?: I don’t think so.